{"id":826,"date":"2009-01-27T20:14:48","date_gmt":"2009-01-28T04:14:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/strivetoenter.com\/wim\/?p=826"},"modified":"2017-06-16T20:11:44","modified_gmt":"2017-06-17T03:11:44","slug":"ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/","title":{"rendered":"Raymond Ortlund says creation order needed to not obscure nature"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"distort1<\/p>\n

In our discussion of CBMW’s book Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood<\/em>, continuing on in chapter 3 in the writings of Raymond C. Ortlund Jr., Mr. Ortlund redefines the creation account in such a way that God’s creation of the male first<\/strong><\/em> is said to be necessary in order that the nature<\/strong><\/em> of the male and female is not obscured.\u00a0 Ortlund writes on page 102:<\/p>\n

God did not make Adam and Eve from the ground at the same time and for one another without distinction.\u00a0 Neither did God make the woman first, and then the man from<\/em> the woman for<\/em> the woman.\u00a0 He could have created them in either of these ways so easily, but He didn’t.\u00a0 Why?\u00a0 Because, presumably<\/strong><\/em>, that would have obscured<\/strong><\/em> the very nature of manhood and womanhood that He intended to make clear. (emphasis is mine)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Ortlund’s presumption here is quite clear from this chapter.\u00a0 God made man first, according to Ortlund, to show that woman-<\/p>\n

…was not his (man’s) equal in that she was his “helper”.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

and<\/p>\n

A man, just by virtue of his manhood, is called to lead<\/strong><\/em> for God.\u00a0 A woman, just by virtue of her womanhood, is called to help<\/strong><\/em> for God. (my emphasis)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

<\/p>\n

When Ortlund says that creating man and woman at the same time would have obscured the very nature of manhood and womanhood, what is he talking about?\u00a0 Ortlund is not defining “manhood” as being male or “womanhood” as being female.\u00a0 He is defining “manhood” and “womanhood” by the preconceived “roles” that he has assigned to each one.\u00a0\u00a0 “Manhood” is now the responsibility to take dominion over the female and to lead her in ways that she supposedly was created to need leading in.\u00a0 Roles then, assigned by the timing of the creation of humanity, are what separates the genders and what creates the priority for the male.\u00a0 But is this truly why God created the male first?\u00a0 Was God giving us a hint<\/em> that there was a priority in rule and leadership given to the male because he was created first from the dirt?<\/p>\n

Let’s reason from the scriptures and think these things through thoughtfully and carefully.\u00a0 First of all, we have to agree with Ortlund that God could<\/strong><\/em> have created the man and the woman from the dirt at the same time<\/strong><\/em>.\u00a0 We also can ask the same question, why did God choose from his own sovereign will to create the man and the woman at different times and in different ways?\u00a0 Why did God not create the woman from the dirt just like he had created the man?<\/p>\n

First of all let’s look at all the bible verses that say that the male is to have leadership over the female because of his first creation.\u00a0 There are exactly zero <\/strong><\/em>verses in the scripture giving first creation status to the male for leadership over the female.\u00a0 The only verses that talks about a cause and effect regarding the order of creation are in 1 Timothy 2:13, 14.<\/p>\n

1 Timothy 2:13\u00a0 For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve.
\n1 Timothy 2:14\u00a0 And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Here we see that the discussion of the second one created is tied to deception<\/strong><\/em> and the first one created is tied to not deceived<\/strong><\/em>.\u00a0 There is zero<\/strong><\/em> connection to male leadership.\u00a0 The fact is that male leadership would have to be read into<\/em> the passage instead of pulled out<\/em> of it because leadership of the male is certainly not in the passage.<\/p>\n

So if the first one created is never tied into leadership, then what was the point of creating the man first?\u00a0 Why couldn’t Eve have been created at the same time right there beside Adam from her side<\/em> of the dirt bed?<\/p>\n

The reason is because God sovereignly chose to create the woman from the man’s body for two reasons<\/em> and the reasons have absolutely nothing to do with leadership.<\/p>\n

1.\u00a0 The woman was created from the man’s body in order for her to be identified as belonging to him in a one-flesh union with the man in the most intimate of relationships.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

If the woman had been created from the dirt beside the man, she would not have been flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone.\u00a0 So if God wanted the woman created not as separate flesh, but in an unmistakable identify with Adam, God had to create him first so that there was a rib that could be taken out to create the woman.\u00a0 By creating the man first and by allowing him to take on a task designed to show him his lack of a mate, the man was prepared to receive his one-flesh partner.<\/p>\n

2.\u00a0 The woman was created from the man’s body in order for her to be a physical descendant of Adam through whom the Messiah could come but without the taint of Adam’s sin.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Before God created Adam and Eve, he knew that the fall would happen and it was his own plan and design that the Word of God would come to take on the flesh of humanity as a true Kinsman Redeemer.\u00a0 This Redeemer was to be both God and man, but it was also necessary for the Redeemer to have a physical blood line back to Adam, yet without the taint of sin.\u00a0 In God’s divine plan, it wasn’t an option<\/em> that Eve was created from Adam’s body, but an absolute necessity<\/em> because of the pre-planned salvation of mankind.\u00a0 You will need to click on the image below or on the highlighted words\u00a0 to go to the illustrated post where God’s sovereign plan is diagrammed showing how the Messiah came as a son of Adam but without the taint of Adam’s sin<\/strong><\/a>.\"Adam<\/a><\/p>\n

After viewing the diagrams of God’s wisdom in the order of creation, isn’t God’s plan for mankind and the redemption of mankind marvellously revealed through the Designer’s plan of Eve’s creation from Adam’s own body?\u00a0 When you viewed the illustrated post linked above, were you able to see God’s ultimate design plan that was designed to effectively bypass the stain of Adam’s sin?\u00a0 Does this\u00a0 make much more biblical sense than the unscriptural idea of assigning the role of\u00a0 “leader”\u00a0 to the first one created when God never<\/em> assigns this role to the male in creation?\u00a0\u00a0 Can you see how the physical connection of Eve back to Adam is not an unplanned side thought but rather God’s wonderful pre-planned design?<\/p>\n

Instead of considering the plan of salvation that was designed before the world was created, Ortlund sees the first creation of the male as a sign of power and rule and primary responsibility. \u00a0 He reasons that having woman created at the same time would “obscure” manhood and womanhood because then primary “roles” could not be assigned to the first and the second.\u00a0 For Ortlund, having Adam and Eve created at the same time with both of them from the dirt would be a missed opportunity for God to hint<\/em> to us that the second one created was made to be “inequal” in leadership behind the first created.\u00a0 But may I respectfully say that what Ortlund has completely failed to present in his chapter in CBMW’s book is the redemptive reason<\/strong><\/em> for Eve’s creation second<\/em> as God’s pre-thought-out creation to come from Adam’s own body.<\/p>\n

Instead of giving the Designer praise for the plan of redemption mirrored in the order<\/strong><\/em> of creation, Raymond C. Ortlund’s focus is on a prideful “royal prerogative” extended to the man.<\/p>\n

Next post we will be continuing on in chapter three of Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood <\/em>and I will throw out for discussion the different theories about what came out of Adam that was used to become the woman.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In our discussion of CBMW’s book Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, continuing on in chapter 3 in the writings of Raymond C. Ortlund Jr., Mr. Ortlund redefines the creation account in such a way that God’s creation of the male first is said to be necessary in order that the nature of the male and female is not obscured.\u00a0 Ortlund writes on page 102: God did not make Adam and Eve from the ground at the same time and for…<\/p>\n

Read More Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":[]},"categories":[5,10,11,13,42,51,67],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\nRaymond Ortlund says creation order needed to not obscure nature - Women in Ministry<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raymond Ortlund says creation order needed to not obscure nature - Women in Ministry\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In our discussion of CBMW’s book Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, continuing on in chapter 3 in the writings of Raymond C. Ortlund Jr., Mr. Ortlund redefines the creation account in such a way that God’s creation of the male first is said to be necessary in order that the nature of the male and female is not obscured.\u00a0 Ortlund writes on page 102: God did not make Adam and Eve from the ground at the same time and for... Read More Read More\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Women in Ministry\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-28T04:14:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-17T03:11:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/distort1.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Cheryl Schatz\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Cheryl Schatz\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/\",\"name\":\"Raymond Ortlund says creation order needed to not obscure nature - Women in Ministry\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-28T04:14:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-17T03:11:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/#\/schema\/person\/d7a33503fddaf9e8c392972b2801441a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raymond Ortlund says creation order needed to not obscure nature\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/\",\"name\":\"Women in Ministry\",\"description\":\"This blog is for dialogue on the issue of women in ministry and the freedom for women to teach the bible in a public setting. It is also for questions and answers on our DVD entitled \u201cWomen in Ministry: Silenced or Set Free?\u201d This 4 DVD set answers the hard passages of scripture that seem to restrict women\u2019s ministry.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/#\/schema\/person\/d7a33503fddaf9e8c392972b2801441a\",\"name\":\"Cheryl Schatz\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e19c4eee7accb8e3a07173a2c17c808?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e19c4eee7accb8e3a07173a2c17c808?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Cheryl Schatz\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/author\/cheryl-schatz\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raymond Ortlund says creation order needed to not obscure nature - Women in Ministry","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raymond Ortlund says creation order needed to not obscure nature - Women in Ministry","og_description":"In our discussion of CBMW’s book Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, continuing on in chapter 3 in the writings of Raymond C. Ortlund Jr., Mr. Ortlund redefines the creation account in such a way that God’s creation of the male first is said to be necessary in order that the nature of the male and female is not obscured.\u00a0 Ortlund writes on page 102: God did not make Adam and Eve from the ground at the same time and for... Read More Read More","og_url":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/","og_site_name":"Women in Ministry","article_published_time":"2009-01-28T04:14:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-17T03:11:44+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/distort1.jpg"}],"author":"Cheryl Schatz","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Cheryl Schatz","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/","url":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/","name":"Raymond Ortlund says creation order needed to not obscure nature - Women in Ministry","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-28T04:14:48+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-17T03:11:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/#\/schema\/person\/d7a33503fddaf9e8c392972b2801441a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/27\/ortlund-obscuring-the-nature-of-male-and-female\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raymond Ortlund says creation order needed to not obscure nature"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/#website","url":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/","name":"Women in Ministry","description":"This blog is for dialogue on the issue of women in ministry and the freedom for women to teach the bible in a public setting. It is also for questions and answers on our DVD entitled \u201cWomen in Ministry: Silenced or Set Free?\u201d This 4 DVD set answers the hard passages of scripture that seem to restrict women\u2019s ministry.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/#\/schema\/person\/d7a33503fddaf9e8c392972b2801441a","name":"Cheryl Schatz","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e19c4eee7accb8e3a07173a2c17c808?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7e19c4eee7accb8e3a07173a2c17c808?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Cheryl Schatz"},"url":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/author\/cheryl-schatz\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p30ZFw-dk","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":837,"url":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/30\/man-give-woman-self-understanding\/","url_meta":{"origin":826,"position":0},"title":"Did the first man give woman her self-understanding?","date":"January 30, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Was the first man needed to give woman her self-understanding?\u00a0 According to Raymond C. Ortlund Jr. pastor of Immanuel Church in Nashville, the answer is yes. Ortlund has written chapter three of Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood CBMW's book. In this chapter,\u00a0 Ortlund says: In designating her \"Woman\" the man\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Adam and headship"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/ray_ortlund1.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":875,"url":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/02\/17\/adams-sin-imputed-to-eve\/","url_meta":{"origin":826,"position":1},"title":"Adam’s sin imputed to Eve?","date":"February 17, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 One of the most bizarre teachings of CBMW is the one taught in Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood in chapter 3 written by Raymond C. Ortlund Jr.\u00a0 Here Mr. Ortlund states that God pronounced the death sentence on Adam alone so that Eve died not because she ate of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Adam and headship"","img":{"alt_text":"Cheryl Schatz Adam's sin 4","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/02\/adam_sin41.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":882,"url":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/02\/20\/did-god-give-up-on-the-woman\/","url_meta":{"origin":826,"position":2},"title":"Did God give up on the woman?","date":"February 20, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Many people think that God was especially hard on Eve after she was deceived by the serpent in the garden.\u00a0 In fact hierarchists have determined that God was so hard on Eve by punishing her with a multitude of lashes for her sin, that some might get the idea that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Adam and headship"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":823,"url":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2009\/01\/24\/the-emperor-has-no-clothes\/","url_meta":{"origin":826,"position":3},"title":"The Emperor has no clothes","date":"January 24, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"In the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood's book Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, chapter 3 is written by Raymond C. Ortlund, Jr. and called \"Male-Female Equality and Male Headship Genesis 1-3\" but honestly, I think it could be retitled \"The Emperor has no clothes\" a thoughtful comment from a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "In the beginning - Genesis"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/fish1.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1906,"url":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2010\/03\/21\/eve-usurped-adam-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":826,"position":4},"title":"Common objections to women in ministry: Eve usurped Adam’s authority","date":"March 21, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Did Eve usurp Adam's Authority? In our continuing topic of common objections to women in ministry, we come to the claim that Eve usurped Adam's authority when she spoke to the serpent. To deal with this claim, we will be looking at both the claim that Eve rebelled against Adam\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Adam and Eve"","img":{"alt_text":"man's authority on Women in Ministry Blog by Cheryl Schatz","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/mans-authority-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1850,"url":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/2010\/02\/17\/gods-design-in-genesis\/","url_meta":{"origin":826,"position":5},"title":"Common objections to women in ministry: God’s design in Genesis","date":"February 17, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"What is God's design in Genesis? How is it that there are millions of Christians who all look to the same Genesis account yet find themselves with different and contradictory truth claims from the same account? \u00a0While many conclude that man was designed in a special way that sets him\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Answering complementarian arguments"","img":{"alt_text":"designed on Women in Ministry blog by Cheryl Schatz","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/02\/designed.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/826"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=826"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/826\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3603,"href":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/826\/revisions\/3603"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=826"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=826"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mmoutreach.org\/wim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=826"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}